For
very many years cat breeders have suffered problems with unexplained neonatal
mortality of kittens, which seems to affect some breeds more than others.
At one time it was considered that these problems, dubbed ‘fading kitten
syndrome’ were probably caused mostly by latent FeLV or FIV infection,
and many of us spent sleepless nights as we awaited the results of yet
another re-test from the virology lab at Glasgow (no in-vitro tests done
in minutes at the surgery in those days!). Eventually, to our relief,
most tests showed no evidence of infection, but failed to explain why
a healthy queen, with plenty of milk, had lost most or all of an apparently
healthy litter of kittens within a few days off birth.
Sometimes
mating to a different stud had a more successful outcome, and certain
matings were simply dismissed as ‘incompatible’ without any real understanding
of why they had failed to produce viable kittens. Often, however, good
quality queens were neutered, written off as ‘poor breeders’ or ‘poor
mothers’, because of their consistent inability to rear their kittens.
However
work done by Professor Urs Giger and his team at the University of Pennsylvania
in the early 1990’s, revealed another reason for neonatal death: incompatibility
of blood group between the queen and her kittens.
In
humans there are several different series of factors involved in blood
type, including the ‘rhesus factor’. The most commonly known and understood
series are the primary Blood Group factors: A, B, and O. (To simplify
a complex matter, type ‘A’ individuals produce antibodies which react
if they come into contact with antigens in ‘alien’ type ‘B’ blood, and
type ‘B’ individuals produce similar antibodies against type ‘A’ blood.
Individuals with the relatively uncommon type ‘AB’ can cope with blood
of either type, as their body ‘recognises’ both factors. Type ‘O’ individuals
react against all other types of blood, but their blood can safely be
given to any other group, as it doesn’t contain any antagonistic factors).
Neither
type ‘A’ nor ‘B’ is dominant over the other (an individual who inherits
‘A’ from one parent and ‘B’ from the other will be type ‘AB’), but both
are dominant to ‘O’.
However,
blood groups in cats work rather differently; no ‘O’ group exists.
The two main types are ‘A’ and ‘B’, with ‘A’ being a simple dominant over
‘B’; so a cat may be type ‘B’ (homozygous recessive), type ’A’ but carrying
‘B’ (heterozygous), or ‘pure A’ (homozygous dominant).
There
is a third type, ‘AB’, which is very uncommon, and until recently, poorly
understood. It is not the same as AB in humans (if a cat receives
‘A’ from one parent and ‘B’ from the other, it will not be type ‘AB’,
but type ‘A’ carrying ‘B’). Recent research suggests that type ‘AB’ operates
as part of the same series as types ‘A’ and ‘B’, although it appears to
be inherited separately; it is recessive to ‘A’ but dominant to ‘B’. Because
it is so uncommon, for practical purposes type ‘AB’ will be ignored for
most of this article, as it is not something, which most breeders are
likely to encounter.
In
cats, type ‘A’ individuals (the dominant type) produce no antibodies,
or only very weak ones, to type ‘B’ blood, and type AB cats produce no
antibodies against either of the other blood types. However type ‘B’ individuals
produce powerful antibodies to type ‘A’ blood, and this is where, in a
breeding situation, problems may arise.
There
are two main areas in which blood group incompatibility may have serious
consequences. The first lies in the situation where a cat receives a transfusion
of blood of a different type, giving rise to a serious incompatibility
reaction, usually with fatal consequences. The second, which is more likely
to be a problem and concern for most breeders, is in the breeding situation,
where incompatibility of blood type exists between a queen and her kittens.
The main problem in this situation is the neonatal mortality of type ‘A’
kittens born to a type ‘B’ queen. As mentioned above, type ‘A’ cats produce
only very low levels of antibodies to type ‘B’ blood, but type ‘B’ cats
produce powerful anti-‘A’ antibodies; these antibodies are present in
high concentrations in the colostrum of a type ‘B’ queen. When newborn
kittens suckle, and ingest the colostrum, the antibodies pass across the
lining of the gut into the kittens’ bloodstreams. If the kittens have
type ‘A’ blood, the antibodies react to the surface proteins of their
red blood cells, and destroy them; this process is called isoerythrolysis.
This can cause acute anaemia, and usually produces noticeable signs of
jaundice as the kittens’ immature livers struggle to clear them of the
dead blood cells. The destruction of the oxygen-carrying red cells and
the resulting anaemia may cause necrotic damage to the kittens’ vital
internal organs, and/or necrosis of their extremities, such as the tips
of ears or tails. Typically, affected kittens will pass characteristically
dark brown or red-coloured urine, due to the excretion of the dead blood
cells. In cases where isoerethrolysis is a risk or is suspected, the kitten
may be stimulated to urinate onto a pad of white cotton wool or tissue
to check for the characteristic discolouration.
For reasons that are not fully understood, the severity of the disease
is variable, with some kittens being more badly affected than others;
many are severely affected and die, but a small number which should theoretically
be at risk appear to be unaffected. Symptoms may include jaundice and
death within the first two days of life; the kitten may survive but the
tail tip may become necrotic and fall off at 10 to 14 days of life; or
in rare cases, no signs of disease may be evident at all. It is also possible
that where damage has occurred to a kitten’s internal organs it may fail
to thrive, and die at several weeks of age.
Fortunately, the susceptibility of kittens to the effects of the maternal
antibodies only lasts for approximately the first 16-24 hours of life.
After this initial period the kitten’s gut lining becomes impermeable
to them, so they are unable to pass across it into the blood stream and
cause damage. For this reason it is safe for type ‘A’ kittens to be returned
to feed from a type ‘B’ mother after this initial critical period has
passed. (Some older papers on this subject state that it is necessary
to avoid type ‘A’ kittens feeding from a type ‘B’ queen for as much as
the first 48 hours, but some more recent research suggests that the critical
period may be as little as 16 hours. Caution suggests allowing at least
24 hours, on the basis of ‘better safe than sorry’).
There is anecdotal evidence (largely involving British Shorthairs, which
have a high proportion of blood type ‘B’) that some type ‘B’ queens may
fail to conceive when mated to a type ‘A’ stud, or may resorb their litters
early in the pregnancy. It also seems that some queens fail to carry their
litters to full term and spontaneously abort at around 6-8 weeks gestation.
At present there has been little scientific research to explain the mechanisms
involved in this pre-natal loss, but it appears possible that in some
cases maternal antibodies may be crossing the placenta and causing the
intrauterine death of kittens of incompatible blood type. However this
is clearly not the general rule, and the exact reasons for these occurrences
remain uncertain at this point.
In practice, when dealing with the potential of blood group incompatibility
in a mating, knowledge is the key to avoiding problems!
The most important thing is to know the blood group of the queen to be
mated; if she is blood type ‘A’ there should not be a risk of neonatal
mortality through isoerethrolysis, irrespective of the blood group of
the stud, as she will not produce any antibodies against the blood in
type ’A’ kittens, and either extremely low levels or none at all against
that of type ‘B’ kittens. However, when the queen is type ‘B’ the potential
for problems exists.
When planning to breed from a type ‘B’ queen, the blood group of the stud
is of utmost significance. Mated to a group ‘B’ stud, only type ‘B’ kittens
will be produced, therefore there is no risk of incompatibility. However
with a type ‘A’ stud, the potential of the queen giving birth to type
‘A’ kittens exists, and all of these will be at risk of developing isoerethrolysis
if allowed to suckle from their dam in the first 24 hours of life. (See
table 1).
Table
Showing Outcomes of Mating Studs and Queens of Different Blood Types |
Stud
|
‘Pure’
Type ‘A’ - homozygous |
‘A’
carrying ‘B’ – heterozygous |
Type ‘B’ – homozygous |
Queen |
‘Pure’
Type ‘A’
- homozygous |
Only
type ‘A’ kittens will be produced –
none at risk.
100% ‘A’ (homozygous)
|
Only
type ‘A’ kittens will be produced. Some may be homozygous & some
heterozygous, but none at risk.
50% ‘A’ (homozygous)
50% ‘A’ (heterozygous)
|
Only
heterozygous type ‘A’ kittens (i.e. ‘A’ carrying ‘B’) will be
produced –
none at risk.
100% ‘A’ (heterozygous)
|
Type ‘A’
carrying ‘B’
- heterozygous |
Only
type ‘A’ kittens will be produced. Some may be homozygous & some
heterozygous, but none at risk.
50% ‘A’ (homozygous)
50% ‘A’ (heterozygous) |
Some
kittens may be type ‘B’, and others type ‘A’, but none at risk.
25% ‘A’ (homozygous)
50% ‘A’ (heterozygous)
25% ‘B’ |
Some
kittens may be type ‘B’, and others type ‘A’, but
none at risk.
50% ‘A’ (heterozygous)
50% ‘B’ |
Type ‘B’ –
homozygous |
Only
heterozygous type ‘A’ kittens will be produced.
ALL
these kittens will be AT RISK.
100% ‘A’ (heterozygous)
|
Some
kittens may be type ‘B’, and others type ‘A’.
All
type ‘A’ kittens will be AT RISK.
50% ‘A’ (heterozygous)
50% ‘B’
|
Only
type ‘B’ kittens will be produced –
none at risk.
100% ‘B’
|
The
most straightforward option may seem to be only ever to use type ’B’ studs
when breeding from a type ‘B’ queen. This may be feasible in breeds such
as British Shorthair, where there is a fairly large genepool and a substantial
majority of the population (59% in UK) is type ‘B’, but even there breeders
may be denying themselves the positive benefits of using a type ‘A’ stud
which is most suitable in other respects, either because of superior conformation
or because of his pedigree.
In breeds such as the Devon Rex, where cats with type ‘B’ blood comprise
a substantial minority of the breed and the genepool is already limited,
further problems exist, which will be discussed later.
Some stud owners may, for whatever reason, decide
not to blood-type their boy, possibly because they have never had neonatal
mortality problems themselves, or are working entirely with type ‘A’ queens,
and therefore do not perceive blood-group incompatibility as a problem.
Suffice to say, for now, that there will be occasions where it will be
desirable to mate a ‘B’ queen to an ‘A’ stud, or to a stud whose blood
type is unknown. In these circumstances it is still possible to avoid
isoerythrolysis and subsequent kitten mortality, providing that care is
taken.
The most important thing to remember is that newborn type ‘A’ kittens
will only be at risk if they ingest ‘anti-A’ antibodies from their mother’s
colostrum during the first 16-24 hours after birth. After that time the
antibodies cannot cross the gut wall into the blood stream to destroy
the kittens’ red blood cells. The really difficult thing is to make sure
that you are there (and awake!) when the queen gives birth, so that you
can remove the kittens from her before they have the opportunity to suckle.
Assuming that you manage this without mishap there are several possible
courses of action to tide you all over the critical 24-hour period.
First, and possibly most simple, is to hand feed all the babies with Cimicat
or a similar feline milk replacement for the initial period, returning
them to mum once they have ceased to be at risk. The disadvantage of this
option is that a mother who has all her kittens taken away may become
very distressed, but it is obviously preferable to losing some or all
of the kittens. However some breeders have successfully managed this situation
by fitting the queen with a long section of stocking or lightweight tubular
elastic bandage, to cover the whole length of the body from shoulders
to haunches, ensuring that all the nipples are well covered to prevent
the kittens from suckling. This allows the kittens to be returned to the
queen between feeds to be kept warm, washed and mothered, allowing bonding
and benefiting both queen and kittens.
Secondly it is now possible to order and obtain blood-typing kits through
veterinary surgeries, with which it is possible to type the individual
kittens at birth using blood from the umbilical cord. However breeders
who have used these kits report that they can be fiddly to use, and that
it is not always easy to obtain enough blood from the cord to perform
an accurate test. The advantage of this approach is that once the kittens
have been tested, any type ’B’ kittens, which are not at risk, can be
returned to the queen for her to feed and care for in the normal way,
which should prevent her from fretting, and the type ‘A’ kittens can be
handfed and returned to her when it is safe to do so. There is always
the chance that ALL the kittens will be type ‘A’ and that they will all
therefore need to be handfed in any case; but if all test as type ‘B’
then the problem is over!
Possibly the optimum solution, if you are in a position to arrange it,
is to plan for a type ‘A’ queen to kitten a week or so before the type
‘B’ queen is due to give birth, and then to cross-foster the kittens for
at least the first 24 hours. The older kittens will be unaffected by the
type ‘B’ queen’s anti-A antibodies, and the newborns will be safe to suckle
from a type ‘A’ queen.
Obviously it is of paramount importance to know the blood type of queens
in those breeds where both blood groups are known to occur with any frequency.
Even in those breeds where type ‘B’ is known to occur only very rarely
it may be useful to type queens when either their pedigree or a previous
history of neonatal or pre-natal loss suggests that there might be a problem.
It should also be considered before outcrossing a queen from a breed where
type ‘B’ is known to occur in the population (eg Cornish Rex), to a stud
from a breed known to be predominantly or exclusively type ‘A’ (eg Siamese/Oriental
or Russian Blue). However it is not critical to know the blood group of
the queen if the stud to which she is mated has already been confirmed
as type ‘B’, as no incompatibility problems arise where the male is of
this type.
Ideally all cats used for breeding, which belong to those breeds where
both blood groups are known to occur, should be blood-typed, but this
will not always be practicable, or seen as necessary by all breeders.
The blood typing of newborns, in situations where a type ‘B’ queen is
likely to produce a mix of type ‘A’ and type ‘B’ kittens, can be a useful
tool in avoiding neonatal mortality due to isoerethrolysis; however it
will not necessary or practical to do this for kittens from all matings,
the majority of which are not at risk.
In the rare instances of cats with blood type ‘AB’, they should for practical
purposes be treated as though they were type ‘A’. A type ‘B’ queen mated
to a type ‘AB’ stud should be treated as if she had been mated to a type
‘A’ stud, and any type ‘AB’ kittens from a type ‘B’ queen should similarly
be treated as if they were type ‘A’ kittens, and should not be allowed
to feed from their mother for the first 24 hours, to avoid the risk of
isoerethrolysis. However a type ‘AB’ queen in theory should be safe to
mate to studs of any blood type, as she will not produce antibodies against
the blood of kittens of her own or either of the other types.
Distribution of blood groups.
The blood group that constitutes the greatest proportion of cats over
all breeds and in non-pedigrees is the dominant type ‘A’.
The proportion of cats with type ‘B’ blood varies significantly between
breeds, with the greatest numbers occurring among British Shorthairs,
Persian-type longhairs, Exotics, and Devon and Cornish Rex.
The overall proportion of cats displaying type ‘AB’ is very tiny, and
the Bengal breed seems to be disproportionately heavily represented within
this group. This may be reflect the use of hybrids, produced by crosses
with the Asian Leopard Cat, in the foundation stock of this breed, as
the genetic makeup in terms of blood groups is significantly different
in some wild species to that of domestic cats.
The most extensive study to date of feline blood-type distribution across
different breeds has been carried out by Professor Giger and his team
at the University of Pennsylvania, which shows 33% of Cornish and 45%
of Devons are type ‘B’.
Limited testing done in the UK, in a study based at the Royal Edinburgh
Veterinary School, shows a somewhat different picture to the overall results
in the international study; however as no Cornish and only 2 Devons were
included in this study it does not provide useful statistics on blood
types in these breeds in the UK. Results of tests recorded by the joint
Rex BAC suggest that distribution of blood types in Devons broadly mirrors
the international picture. On the basis of anecdotal evidence, the vast
majority of Cornish in the UK now seem to be blood type ‘A’, although
the BAC now accepts that the presence of type ‘B’ within the UK breeding
pool, and suggests that all breeding cats should be bloodtyped.
Overall, differences between the American and UK studies emerged, especially
in respect of the unexpectedly high proportion of type ‘AB’ cats in the
UK study. This particular difference may reflect the proportion of Bengals
typed in this study, but may also be influenced by the fact that a new
testing method was also under trial.
The explanation for the differences between the UK figures and the wider
international picture may in fact lie, at least in part, in the relatively
isolated position of the UK in respect of the import of cats from abroad.
Its geographic status as an island means that the native non-pedigree
cat population may have developed largely separate from that even in neighbouring
parts of mainland Europe; a slightly higher proportion of group ‘B’ blood
in the original population may have been exaggerated and consolidated
by ongoing interbreeding within this (relatively) restricted gene pool.
During the 20th century the imposition of quarantine regulations,
introduced in order to protect the UK’s rabies-free status, will undoubtedly
have increased the isolation in the indigenous non-pedigree population
caused by basic geographical factors.
This has been of even greater importance in respect of the pedigree cat
fancy. It has always been possible to export cats, and indeed both Cornish
and Devon Rex breeds have spread around the world from their origins in
South West England. However, importing cats has been severely restricted
by both the bureaucratic complexity and the sheer financial expense of
putting an animal through six months quarantine in addition to purchase
and shipping costs.
Until very recently, therefore, the feline genepool in the UK has had
fairly low levels of input from abroad, compared with those countries
in which the cross-border movement of animals has been unrestricted, either
for sale or for stud service. However, the introduction of the Pet Travel
Scheme (‘Pet Passports’) may in time have a significant impact upon the
genepool of pedigree cats in the UK. Not only does it make the import
of breeding animals either from or via other EU countries much easier
and less expensive, but also opens up the possibility in the future of
taking queens to stud in mainland Western Europe.
Differences in breeding and showing policies under the GCCF as compared
with FIFe, CFA and other international cat fancy organisations may also
account for some differences in the gene pools of specific breeds in the
UK, compared to their equivalents elsewhere in the world. These policies,
especially in respect of permitting outcrosses, have in many cases been
influenced by the difficulty of importing cats and by the consequent restriction
of the numbers of breeding stock available within certain individual breeds.
It is not unreasonable to suppose that overall differences in the gene
pool are reflected by the differences in the prevalence of blood groups.
When introducing overseas bloodlines to their breeding programs, UK breeders
need to be aware where differences in blood group distribution profiles
exist, and where appropriate to type and to take appropriate action to
avoid running into incompatibility problems, either in the F1 or subsequent
generations.
It is interesting that Australia, which is also a rabies-free country
and operates a quarantine system for domestic cats, also shows significant
differences from the norm in this respect, with a much higher percentage
of type ‘B’ cats than that in the overall international figures. It may
be significant that Australia has no indigenous felines, and that the
majority of the cats that formed the foundation of the species in this
continent probably originated from the UK.
Noticeable variations in blood-type distribution of non-pedigree domestic
cats also occurs regionally within the USA, with blood type ‘B’ occurring
at less than 1% in the North East and Midwestern states, and at up to
6% on the West coast. No theories are available at present to account
for these differences.
Seeking to eliminate an
‘unwanted’ gene.
In theory, eliminating a dominant gene is straightforward, and simply
requires that all cats of the dominant phenotype (in this case blood type
‘A’) should be neutered. This is only likely to be considered in British
Shorthairs, as this is the only breed in which group ‘B’ is the majority
blood group.
In practice, this is less easy to carry out. If a particularly good specimen
of a breed is type ‘A’, the owner is likely to be reluctant to neuter
the cat and to lose the positive benefits that it could give to their
bloodlines, and, indeed, to the breed as a whole. People with good type
‘A’ queens will not suffer problems with neonatal erethrolysis in kittens,
and are unlikely to see any benefit in having them spayed.
A possible working compromise under these circumstances would be to neuter
all type ‘A’ males, using only type ‘B’ studs within the breed, so that
problems with neonatal mortality are avoided irrespective of the blood
group of the queen to which they are mated. This in turn is likely in
the longer term to further reduce the incidence of blood group ‘A’ within
the breed.
To eliminate a recessive gene from breeding stock is a far more difficult
proposition than eliminating a dominant. Even if the recessive phenotype
(blood type ‘B’) occurs at fairly low frequency and all cats of that blood
type are neutered, there is likely to remain a surprisingly high number
of cats that are type ‘A’ but carrying the recessive gene for type ‘B’.
For example, in a breed with only 8% type ‘B’ individuals, over 43% could
be heterozygous ‘A’ (carrying ‘B’). (See Table 2).
The GCCF Cat Welfare Trust is currently supporting a project proposed
by Dr Matthew Binns of the Animal Health Trust, to produce a feline genome
map. When this project is complete it will be possible to genetically
screen cats to check their carrier status for a whole range of recessive
genetic diseases, as has already been done for the recessive hereditary
disease gangliosidosis in the Korat breed. It should also be possible
by similar methods to detect which type ‘A’ cats carry the gene for blood
group ‘B’, but whether it is a sensible use of resources to test cats
for the presence of a gene which is not in itself disease-causing or life-threatening
is doubtful.
Given the absence at present of a genetic test to identify carriers, the
only available method of identification is test mating.
This involves mating the cat to be tested either to cats of the recessive
genotype, or to proven carriers of the gene. If a type ‘A’ cat produces
a total of 11 kittens, none of which are type ‘B’, when mated to type
‘B’ cats, or 19 kittens (again all type ‘A’) when mated to a proven type
‘B’ carrier, there is only a 0.1% probability (ie one chance in a thousand)
that the tested cat is a carrier of the recessive type ‘B’. However a
single type ‘B’ kitten is sufficient to prove that the cat is a carrier!
Clearly a large number of kittens would need to be produced, all of which
would be either possible or known carriers of the ‘unwanted’ recessive
gene, and all of which would have to be blood-typed. Because of the numbers
of kittens involved, test-mating queens is certainly unlikely to be feasible,
and even test-mating studs could prove extremely expensive. Also it should
be remembered that this only gives a probability that the tested cat is
not a carrier – there are always the ones that defy the statistics, and
even with testing to this high level of probability there is always a
tiny chance of the recessive gene ‘slipping through the net’. It has been
said that recessives, like diamonds, are forever! Also, as with genetic
testing, it is doubtful whether it is worthwhile to go to these lengths
in respect of a non-lethal gene.
B
phenotype
homozygous |
A
phenotype
heterozygous |
A
phenotype
homozygous |
B
phenotype
homozygous |
A
phenotype
heterozygous |
A
phenotype
homozygous |
0% |
0.0000% |
100.0000% |
51% |
40.8286% |
8.1714% |
1% |
18.0000% |
81.0000% |
52% |
40.2221% |
7.7779% |
2% |
24.2843% |
73.7157% |
53% |
39.6022% |
7.3978% |
3% |
28.648% |
68.3590% |
54% |
38.9694% |
7.0306% |
4% |
32.0000% |
64.0000% |
55% |
38.3240% |
6.6760% |
5% |
34.7214% |
60.2786% |
56% |
37.6663% |
6.3337% |
6% |
36.9898% |
57.0102% |
57% |
36.9967% |
6.0033% |
7% |
38.9150% |
54.0850% |
58% |
36.3155% |
5.6845% |
8% |
40.5685% |
51.438% |
59% |
35.6229% |
5.3771% |
9% |
42.0000% |
49.0000% |
60% |
34.9193% |
5.0807% |
8% |
43.2456% |
46.7544% |
61% |
34.2050% |
4.7950% |
11% |
44.3325% |
44.6675% |
62% |
33.4802% |
4.5198% |
12% |
45.2820% |
42.7180% |
63% |
32.7451% |
4.2549% |
13% |
46.118% |
40.8890% |
64% |
32.0000% |
4.0000% |
14% |
46.8331% |
39.1669% |
65% |
31.2452% |
3.7548% |
8% |
47.4597% |
37.5403% |
66% |
30.4808% |
3.5192% |
8% |
48.0000% |
36.0000% |
67% |
29.7071% |
3.2929% |
8% |
48.4621% |
34.5379% |
68% |
28.9242% |
3.0758% |
18% |
48.8528% |
33.1472% |
69% |
28.1325% |
2.8675% |
19% |
49.1780% |
31.8220% |
70% |
27.3320% |
2.6680% |
20% |
49.4427% |
30.5573% |
71% |
26.5230% |
2.4770% |
21% |
49.658% |
29.3485% |
72% |
25.7056% |
2.2944% |
22% |
49.8083% |
28.198% |
73% |
24.8801% |
2.1199% |
23% |
49.9166% |
27.0834% |
74% |
24.0465% |
1.9535% |
24% |
49.9796% |
26.0204% |
75% |
23.2051% |
1.7949% |
25% |
50.0000% |
25.0000% |
76% |
22.3560% |
1.6440% |
26% |
49.9804% |
24.0196% |
77% |
21.4993% |
1.5007% |
27% |
49.9230% |
23.0770% |
78% |
20.6352% |
1.3648% |
28% |
49.8301% |
22.1699% |
79% |
19.7639% |
1.2361% |
29% |
49.7033% |
21.2967% |
80% |
18.8854% |
1.1146% |
30% |
49.5445% |
20.4555% |
81% |
18.0000% |
1.0000% |
31% |
49.3553% |
19.6447% |
82% |
17.1077% |
0.8923% |
32% |
49.1371% |
18.8629% |
83% |
16.2087% |
0.7913% |
33% |
48.8913% |
18.1087% |
84% |
15.3030% |
0.6970% |
34% |
48.6190% |
17.388% |
85% |
14.3909% |
0.6091% |
35% |
48.328% |
16.6784% |
86% |
13.4724% |
0.5276% |
36% |
48.0000% |
16.0000% |
87% |
12.5476% |
0.4524% |
37% |
47.6553% |
15.3447% |
88% |
11.6166% |
0.3834% |
38% |
47.2883% |
14.718% |
89% |
10.6796% |
0.3204% |
39% |
46.9000% |
14.1000% |
90% |
9.7367% |
0.2633% |
40% |
46.4911% |
13.5089% |
91% |
8.7878% |
0.2122% |
41% |
46.0625% |
12.9375% |
92% |
7.8333% |
0.1667% |
42% |
45.6148% |
12.3852% |
93% |
6.8730% |
0.1270% |
43% |
45.1488% |
11.8512% |
94% |
5.9072% |
0.0928% |
44% |
44.6650% |
11.3350% |
95% |
4.9359% |
0.0641% |
45% |
44.1641% |
10.8359% |
96% |
3.9592% |
0.0408% |
46% |
43.6466% |
10.3534% |
97% |
2.9772% |
0.0228% |
47% |
43.1131% |
9.8869% |
98% |
1.9899% |
0.0101% |
48% |
42.5641% |
9.4359% |
99% |
0.9975% |
0.0025% |
49% |
42.0000% |
9.0000% |
100% |
0.0000% |
0.0000% |
50% |
41.4214% |
8.5786% |
|
|
|
Some
breeders who work with breeds where both ‘A’ and ‘B’ blood groups occur
may feel that their best course of action would be to eliminate the minority
group from their own breeding stock, and it may indeed be feasible for
individual breeders to choose to test their cats, and to breed only from
cats of one blood group. However one possible scenario is that of some
breeders choosing to work only with type ‘A’, and others only with type
‘B’. In the long term this could lead to a situation where a single breed,
in terms of registration and standard of points, effectively divides into
two parallel breeds with separate, reduced genepools, split along the
lines of blood group.
If
co-ordinated efforts were made to eliminate the minority blood group throughout
a breed, the genetic implications could be serious, especially in a breed
that already has a limited genepool and relatively small numbers of breeding
cats, as this would inevitably cause significant diminution of the existing
genepool and exacerbate the problems of inbreeding which already exist.
The
presence of type ‘B’ blood in both Cornish and Devon breeds should not
be surprising, given the origins of both breeds in the non-pedigree cats
of the South West of England; it is quite probable that the gene has been
there since the beginnings of both breeds. The indigenous cat population
of the British Isles contained a higher than average proportion of type
‘B’ individuals, and is the same basic genetic base that gave rise to
the British Shorthair, with its very high incidence of blood type ‘B’.
In the early days of both breeds, the most common breeds used to expand
the genepools were non-pedigree domestic shorthairs and British Shorthairs.
It is probable that many of the early exports from the UK to the USA were
either group ‘B’ or carriers of the gene.
In
North America, the CFA closed both breeds to outcrossing several years
ago, which will to a large extent have had the effect of ‘freezing’ the
genepools. In the UK this has not been the case, and the breeds used as
outcrosses at different times may have caused variations in the blood
group distribution over a period of time.
In
the early years of the Devon Rex, before it was established as a different
genetic mutation from the Cornish, several crosses were made between the
two breeds, and the straight-coated hybrids were used in the progression
of both. Consequently it is probable that all Devon lines share a common
genetic inheritance with the Cornish Rex, and indeed Devons carrying the
Cornish gene, from crosses made almost forty years ago, are still occasionally
exposed by accidental matings with Cornish! Similarly, very few UK Cornish
lines are without any trace of Devon in the pedigree, although Du-Bu,
Amaska, Senty-Twix and Zureiqa Cornish Rex were all scrupulous not to
include any cats descended from the Devon hybrid lines in their breeding
programs.
With
Devons, probably the most common outcross has been to the British Shorthair.
Early matings were also made to Persian-type longhair breeds in an effort
to improve coat density, although the current breeding policy now prohibits
such outcrosses due to the undesirability of perpetuating the longhair
gene in the breed (the incidence of type ‘B’ blood in these breeds currently
stands at around 8%). Both British and Persians may have either increased
or consolidated the high incidence of group ‘B’ blood within the Devon
genepool.
More
recently a number of Burmese have been used as outcrosses; with their
almost exclusively type ‘A’ blood, these cats may have caused a movement
in the balance of blood type distribution within the Devon breed, but
this is almost certainly counterbalanced by the continued popularity of
British Shorthairs as an outcross.
With
Cornish Rex the picture is rather more complex. British Shorthairs were
heavily used in the early development of the breed within the UK; however
this caused a noticeable change in type away from the original moderate
foreign type of Kallibunker. Several moves were made to counteract this.
Alison
Ashford imported Riovista Kismet, a blue Cornish male, from Canada, and
he is behind the pedigrees of many of today’s cats, especially those descended
from Alison’s ‘Annelida’ lines. It is quite possible that Kismet was himself
either type ‘B’ or a carrier of the gene, as blood typing of Cornish in
recent years has shown that an unusually high proportion of cats in Canada,
and those bred from Canadian lines, are of type ‘B’.
Other
moves to refine the type and to eliminate the cobbiness brought in by
the British Shorthairs involved a number of outcrosses to Siamese. This
is likely to have increased the proportion of type ‘A’ within the breed,
as this breed is exclusively blood type ‘A’. The downside of these outcrosses
was a significant decline in coat density, and in an effort to counteract
this without again losing type, Hetty Hamilton of Zureiqa cats outcrossed
to Arctic Piatrovitch, a Russian Blue, another exclusively type ‘A’ breed.
During
the past 20 years or so British Shorthairs have not been a popular outcross
for Cornish, although they remain an approved outcross breed in the breeding
p |